|
|
Post by aniuwolf on Oct 14, 2009 17:14:06 GMT -5
some people have said that if there was a sequel to Coraline, it would ruin the movie, which I really don't get.
I mean, if you're already a Coraline fan, wouldn't you want a sequel?
|
|
|
|
Post by Miss Emelle on Oct 14, 2009 19:00:22 GMT -5
Well, The movie AND the book have a simple purity to it that should be left alone. Yanno The Nightmare Before Christmas? Disney was GONNA make a sequel. Instead of using stop-motion, they were gonna use C.G. THEY WERE GOING TO MAKE IT COMPUTER GENERATED. That's one of MANY ways a classic movie can be destroyed with a sequel.
|
|
|
|
Post by aniuwolf on Oct 14, 2009 19:49:19 GMT -5
oh, well, if they where gonna make a sequel, it should still be stop-motion.
but the thing about Coraline was that it felt open ended. I mean, the Beldam can still get her other hand under the door, right? and how did she know to make that doll look like Coraline if she's never seen her before?
|
|
|
|
Post by Skunk™ on Oct 19, 2009 22:47:01 GMT -5
Mmmm I wouldn't mind to see a sequel! On the chance it might be gooood!
But if it was horrible. Then i'd just stick to the original. c: A bad sequal wouldn't make me hurt the first!
|
|
gray64
New Kid
Beldam? You mean the "Other Mother"?
Posts: 7
|
Post by gray64 on Dec 28, 2009 2:13:52 GMT -5
Uh because it doesn't need one! It's perfect the way it is and doesn't need a sequel to increase its popularity or make it a classic! It already is popular and it already is a classic! So there ya go, question answered.
|
|
|
|
Post by aniuwolf on Dec 28, 2009 18:26:23 GMT -5
hey, don't get mad. I agree, the movie was perfect.
it's just...I wish there was more of the movie, you know? like even if there isn't a sequel, it would be interesting if they made a TV show or something.
like I wanna see other things they can make with the puppets, like do a half-hour show or something.
|
|
